THE LIFE OF CHRIST
PART 77
In our last two lessons, we
saw Jesus questioned about His authority, but He asked a question about the
baptism John preached, but they refused to answer it, so He did not answer
their question. Well, at least not directly, but He did speak three parables
against these opposing Jews. As usually, they were a little slow at perceiving
that He was talking about them, but they always figured out in the end.
In this lesson, we are
going to pick up where we left off. What happens next is recorded in Matthew
22, Mark 12, and Luke 20. As I have done in the past, I will blend these
accounts together as they each provide certain details that the other do not.
Notice what Luke says:
Luke
20:19 And the chief priests and the scribes that very hour
sought to lay hands on Him, but they feared the people -- for they knew He had
spoken this parable against them.
Matthew
22:15 Then the Pharisees went and
plotted how they might entangle Him in His talk.
When
you combine these two, you see that we have the chief priest, Pharisees and
scribes who were plotting on how they can entangle Jesus in His talk.
The
word entrap means:
1)
to ensnare, entrap 1a) of
birds 2) metaph. of the attempt to elicit from one some remark which can be
turned into an accusation against him (Stongs).
These opposing Jews are members of the Sanhedrin
council, which was had 70 members and 1 president. They were composed of
Pharisees, Sadducees, and scribes. As, we just read, they wanted to catch Jesus
in His words, so they might be able to take Him down, but they had tried this
many times in many ways and failed, but they were persistent so this is what
they decided to do.
Luke 20:20 So they watched Him, and sent spies who pretended to be
righteous, that they might seize on His words, in order to deliver Him to the
power and the authority of the governor.
Mark 12:13Then they sent to Him some of the Pharisees and the Herodians,
to catch Him in His words.
These verses make the intent of these men crystal
clear. No matter what questions they ask or what they say to Jesus, we can know
that their only motive is to trap Jesus. Jesus is the great at bringing people
together. For example, He brought together a tax collector and zealot who work
together as apostles, but He also brought together those who opposed Him, even
though they are naturally enemies. We see this in our text as well because
normally Pharisees and Herodians would have nothing
to do with each other, but they had same goal in mind, which was to trap Jesus,
so they worked together.
Now let’s see what their plan of attack is:
Luke 20:21 Then they asked Him, saying, "Teacher, we
know that You say and teach rightly, and You do not
show personal favoritism, but teach the way of God in truth: 22 "Is it lawful for us to
pay taxes to Caesar or not?"
What flattery. I guess they
thought if they played into Jesus’ ego with all these swelling words that it
would catch Him off guard. Notice, they said He taught what was right and did
not change His teaching based on personal favoritism,
but always taught the truth according to the way of God. Then they ask this
loaded question about if it was lawful to pay taxes to Caesar or not.
If Jesus said, yes, then then
they could get people to turn on Him because many Jews despised having to pay
taxes to the Romans because they felt like their only King was God and He
should receive tribute. However, if Jesus said, no, then they could report this
to the Roman officials and have Him arrested by them.
While this seemed like an
impossible question to answer, let’s see how Jesus handles it.
Lk. 20:23 But He perceived their craftiness, and said to
them, "Why do you test Me? 24 "Show Me a denarius. Whose
image and inscription does it have?" They answered and said,
"Caesar's." 25 And
He said to them, "Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's,
and to God the things that are God's."
26 But they could not catch Him in His words in the presence
of the people. And they marveled at His answer and kept silent.
Mt. 22:22 When they had heard these words, they
marveled, and left Him and went their way.
Matthew’s account says Jesus
perceived their wickedness and called them hypocrites. Their words of flattery
did not fool Him, and He answered their question in way they never dreamed of
because He showed that is right was Caesar to collect his taxes and that same
time that they should give to God what belongs to Him.
As Stancliff
wrote:
Caesar’s governments had the right to require men
to pay taxes. But Caesar did not have the right to make spiritual laws. They
were two different kinds of government. There was civil government and there
was spiritual government. Men had a responsibility to be subject to each of
them as long as civil government did not defy spiritual government. (Good message Bible commentary)
So, Jesus’ answer causes these opposing Jews to
marvel and it leaves them speechless. Matthew tells us they went their way. Now
that these Herodians had failed, some Sadducees try
to see if they can trap Jesus. Their attempt is recorded in these same three
accounts, but they are almost identical, so I will just use Luke’s account.
Luke 20:27 Then some of the Sadducees, who deny that there
is a resurrection, came to Him and asked Him, 28 saying: "Teacher, Moses
wrote to us that if a man's brother dies, having a wife, and he dies
without children, his brother should take his wife and raise up offspring for
his brother. 29 "Now
there were seven brothers. And the first took a wife, and died without
children. 30 "And the
second took her as wife, and he died childless.
31 "Then the third took her, and in like manner the
seven also; and they left no children, and died. 32 "Last of all the woman
died also. 33
"Therefore, in the resurrection, whose wife does she become? For all seven
had her as wife."
The Sadducees were rich and powerful men, who did
believe in the resurrection, the immortality of the soul, or in angels. They
were materialistic and they did not follow the oral law that had been made by
the Pharisees. Perhaps this argument about the resurrection was one they had
used successfully against the Pharisees, so now they are going to try it out on
Jesus.
They could have easily used two brothers in their
example, but apparently they thought using seven brothers would make their case
stronger. Their argument comes from what Moses wrote in:
Deuteronomy 25:5 " If brothers dwell together, and one of them
dies and has no son, the widow of the dead man shall not be married to a
stranger outside the family; her husband's brother shall go in to her,
take her as his wife, and perform the duty of a husband's brother to her. 6 "And it shall be that the
firstborn son which she bears will succeed to the name of his dead brother, that
his name may not be blotted out of Israel.
7 "But if the man does not want to take his brother's
wife, then let his brother's wife go up to the gate to the elders, and say, 'My
husband's brother refuses to raise up a name to his brother in Israel; he will
not perform the duty of my husband's brother.'
8 "Then the elders of his city shall call him and speak
to him. But if he stands firm and says, 'I do not want to take
her,' 9 "then his
brother's wife shall come to him in the presence of the elders, remove his
sandal from his foot, spit in his face, and answer and say, 'So shall it be
done to the man who will not build up his brother's house.' 10 "And his name shall be
called in Israel, 'The house of him who had his sandal removed.'
Regarding what the Sadducees
asked. H. Leo Boles wrote:
The case that they citied required a brother to
take his deceased brother’s wife and raise a son unto his brother that his
brother’s name might not perish in the genealogy. The Sadducees thought to show
from the law the manifest absurdity of the doctrine of the resurrection,
because they presumed that the present relations of life must continue in the
future state.
I can almost see the smirk on
their faces because they thought Jesus would not be able to answer this exaggerated
example they had given. However, Jesus is about to wipe any smirk they may have
had right off their faces.
Mark 12:24 Jesus answered and said to them, "Are you not
therefore mistaken, because you do not know the Scriptures nor the power of
God?
Before we read any further, I
want you to think about how much this would have stung because Jesus is telling
them, you don’t know what you are talking about because you do know the
Scripture and you do not now the power of God. Jesus is about to show these
Sadducees that they are wrong about there being no resurrection and no angels.
Mark 12:25 "For when they rise from the dead, they
neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven. 26 "But concerning the dead,
that they rise, have you not read in the book of Moses, in the burning bush
passage, how God spoke to him, saying, 'I am the God of Abraham,
the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'?
27 "He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the
living. You are therefore greatly mistaken."
Jesus teaches them that
marriage does not continue in heaven because we become like angels. Please pay
attention, Jesus said we will be like angels not become angels. There is no
death in heaven. So, not only does this answer their initial question about who
this woman would be married to in heaven, which is none of them, it shows that
there is a resurrection and that there are angels.
Jesus makes a strong argument based
on what the Angel of the Lord spoke from the burning bush about Abraham, Isaac,
and Jacob. He said, “I am the God of” in present tense even though these three
were dead physically. So, this shows that there is life after physical death
because God could not be their God presently if they were not still alive in
some way. Of course, there are many other verses that show that we will be
resurrected in that day when Jesus comes again. Such as:
John 5:28 "Do not marvel at this; for the hour is
coming in which all who are in the graves will hear His voice 29 "and come forth -- those
who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil,
to the resurrection of condemnation.
At this point, I want to give
you argument against those who teach the A.D. 70 doctrine. Now some of you may
have no idea what this group teaches, but in nutshell, they teach that all
Biblical prophecy including the resurrection happened by or at A.D. 70.
So, the A.D. 70 doctrine teaches that
the resurrection happened at the destruction of Jerusalem and it
denies a bodily resurrection.
Now some of you might wonder how in
the world anyone could believe such a thing, but there are some who do. I will
tie in what Jesus said about our resurrection in just a minute, but first I
want to examine Jesus’ resurrection. Apparently, some in the Corinthian
church were denying that Jesus had been raised from the dead. Paul
set out to correct them in 1 Corinthians 15. He pointed out how over
500 people had witnessed Christ’s bodily resurrection (vs. 4-8).
Paul goes on to say that Christ, who
was raised from the dead, is the first fruits and when He comes again, those
who belong to Him will be raised from the dead as well as can be seen in:
1
Corinthians 15:20 But now Christ is
risen from the dead, and has become the firstfruits
of those who have fallen asleep. 21
For since by man came death, by Man also came the resurrection of
the dead. 22 For as in Adam
all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. 23 But each one in his own order:
Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ's
at His coming.
Since Jesus is the first fruits,
and His resurrection was a bodily one, this would indicate that our
resurrection is to be a bodily one as well. The only way the A.D. 70 doctrine
could be true is if Jesus’ resurrection was not a bodily one. If that is the
case, I would like to know what happened to His physical body. Did it just
disappear or did someone remove it? It seems clear to me that A.D. 70 doctrine
is wrong.
We learn from Paul that at the
resurrection we will be changed in the twinkling of an eye and we will be given
an incorruptible body (1 Cor.
15:50-54). Paul also tells us that a Christian’s citizenship
is in heaven and how that he was eagerly waiting for Jesus’ return so that
Jesus would transform his and every Christian’s lowly body and conform them to
His glorious body (Phil. 3:20-21).
John agrees with this when he says, “when Christ is revealed, we shall be like Him and see Him as He is” (1 Jn. 3:2).
Have these things already happened as
the A.D. 70 doctrine teaches? If they have, I personally am not
impressed with this new glorious body that is supposed to be immortal
and incorruptible. Obviously, the resurrection has not happened yet.
As we read in our text earlier, the
Sadducees were trying to trap Jesus in a question about the
resurrection. Jesus responded to them by saying this in Luke’s
account:
Luke 20:34 And Jesus answered and said to them, "The
sons of this age marry and are given in marriage. 35 "But those who are counted
worthy to attain that age, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry
nor are given in marriage; 36
"nor can they die anymore, for they are equal to the angels and are sons
of God, being sons of the resurrection.
Jesus’ words are a deathblow to the A.D.
70 doctrine because at the resurrection we will not marry or be given in
marriage, we cannot die anymore, and we are equal with angels. It is
pretty obvious that we are still marrying, and we are still
dying. Now if the A.D. 70 advocates try to make dying a spiritual
concept, then this means we cannot sin, because sin is what causes spiritual
death (Rom. 6:23). If
they try to apply the resurrection to the church, then guess what that means?
It means that church was dead until A.D. 70. So, are you ready to accept
such a notion? I would hope not and I hope you are able to see why
the resurrection Jesus spoke of is still in future and did not happen in A.D.
70.
From this point, Mark gives us more
details of what happened next so I will us his account now. After the Sadducees
failed, Matthew tells us that the Pharisees gathered together, but a lawyer or
as Mark says a scribe, comes up to Jesus as we read in:
Mark 12:28 Then one of the scribes
came, and having heard them reasoning together, perceiving that He had answered
them well, asked Him, "Which is the first commandment of all?" 29 Jesus answered him, "The
first of all the commandments is: 'Hear, O Israel, the LORD our God, the
LORD is one. 30 'And you
shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all
your mind, and with all your strength.' This is the first
commandment. 31 "And the
second, like it, is this: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'
There is no other commandment greater than these." 32 So the scribe said to Him,
"Well said, Teacher. You have spoken the truth, for there is one
God, and there is no other but He. 33
"And to love Him with all the heart, with all the understanding, with all
the soul, and with all the strength, and to love one's neighbor as oneself, is
more than all the whole burnt offerings and sacrifices."
Scribes copied the law and they were
considered experts of what the law said. According to the Talmud, there were
613 laws. So to ask which one was the greatest could certainly seem to be
difficult task, but this posed no problem for Jesus. First, He quoted from
Deut. 6:4-5, which it to love God with our heart, soul, mind, and strength,
which covers our duty to God.
But Jesus didn’t stop there because He
gave the second greatest command, which is to love your neighbor as yourself,
which point out man’s duty to man. The scribe seems to be very happy with
Jesus’ answer and he even praises Him for His answer because he knew that it was
the right answer. Next, Jesus says:
Mark 12:34 Now
when Jesus saw that he answered wisely, He said to him, "You are not far
from the kingdom of God." But after that no one dared question Him.
Even though these men came with the
intent to trap Jesus in His words, we can see that at least this one scribe was
making a connection with Jesus. Yes, he thought his question might trip Jesus
up, but this man was honest enough to admit that Jesus had spoken the truth and
then he repeats what Jesus says in own words, Jesus considered his words as
being wise. He even tells him that he is not far from the kingdom. In other
words, if we continue having such wisdom about God’s Word, it will lead down
the right path toward the kingdom.
Personally, I love moments like these
when you are studying with someone who is holding on to a false doctrine and
then you find that one thing where they begin to see the truth, and you know
that maybe, just maybe, they might be able to start seeing the whole truth
soon.
After Jesus silenced them all, they
were apparently out of ideas on how to trap Him in His words because our text
tells us that no one dared questioned Him after that. However, Jesus makes
another statement, which will bring our lesson to a close.
Mark 12:35 Then Jesus answered and said, while He taught in
the temple, "How is it that the scribes say that the Christ is the
Son of David? 36 "For
David himself said by the Holy Spirit: 'The LORD said to my Lord, "Sit at
My right hand, Till I make Your enemies Your
footstool." ' 37
"Therefore David himself calls Him 'Lord'; how is He then his
Son?" And the common people heard Him gladly.
Jesus asked a question about
what the scribes had been teaching about the Messiah just being a son of David.
However, Jesus quotes Psalm 110:1 and asks the question, why would David call
the Messiah Lord if he was just his son? When David referred to Him as Lord, He
was showing that he himself was under His power. He was showing the Christ
would be much more than just a mere son of David, He was Deity. Had He just
been a created son like all other sons, then David would have never called Him
Lord.
A couple more things I want to
point out about this is that we see all three members of the Godhead
represented. First, we have the Holy Spirit, whom Jesus said David spoke by. Second,
you have the Father, who is the first Lord, and then, the second Lord who would
sit at the Father’s right hand is Jesus. Here, we have a clear distinction of
all three members of the Godhead. This is just one of many places that you can
use to teach certain religious groups that there are 3 distinct individuals who
make up the Godhead, and it also shows that Jesus was not just some created
being that came into existence in the first century because He is Deity and He
has always existed.
I hope you learned some
valuable lessons from what Jesus taught in the verses we examined, and I hope
you might be able to use some of things I taught you to teach others who are
confused about who Jesus is. Next time, we will be taking a close look at
Matthew 23.